ABU - ASALKAN BUKAN UMNO

ABU - ASALKAN BUKAN UMNO

My Exchange Banner

create your own banner at mybannermaker.com!
Copy this code to your website to display this banner!

Outright online bookkeeping for just $9.99 / mo!

Sunday, June 3, 2012

AdilanClub: Najib's illusory transformation: The PM is MOONWALKING part 2!

Sulaiman Kamal | 5:02 AM | | Best Blogger Tips

Do You Like This Story?





AdilanClub:Breaking news, is the best for news

There are countries with preventive detention that do not meet international laws and human rights requirements. There are also many other countries that have preventive detention regimes that are not only effective but also complies with the rule of law and human rights. Najib in enacting SOSMA has chosen to follow the countries using the model that deviates the most from international laws and human rights conventions.

Stella Busch Elias in her article “Rethinking ‘Preventive Detention’ From a Comparative Perspective: Three Frameworks for Detaining Terrorists Suspects” carried out a survey of the preventive detention framework of 32 countries including Malaysia. She found there were countries with preventive detention framework that allowed terrorist suspects to be detained, charged and put on trial under the existing criminal justice system with modifications and adjustments that largely complied with the rule of law and international standards for human rights.


>Link Info : General Issues - Politics


These are Brazil, Colombia, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Norway, Greece, Ireland, Spain, Turkey and the United Kingdom. These countries have combated terrorism long before the US did after 9/11. The United Kingdom had to deal with the IRA during the Troubles in Northern Ireland, France in the Algerian War of Independence, Italy in their fight with terrorist organizations such as the Red Brigade, Greece fought with left-wing terrorists, Spain combated the Basque Separatist Movement, ETA (Euskadi Ta Askatasuna) and Turkey with various domestic terrorist groups ranging from the Kurdish Workers’ Party (PKK) to the Revolutionary People’s Liberation Front. They have preventive detention but it meets the requirements for the rule of law and complies with the conventions on human rights.


The national security preventive detention model adopted by the Bush administration for detention without charge and without trial followed countries such as India, Kenya, Malaysia, Mozambique, Nigeria, Pakistan, Russia, Singapore, Sri Lanka, Swaziland, Tanzania, Trinidad & Tobago and Zambia.

The countries that adopted a framework for detention before trial in accordance with criminal laws are all stable democracies with well developed political systems and are signatories to the various international conventions on human rights.

The countries that adopted preventive detention without trial or a proper trial are countries not known for their human rights record. They are not icons of democracy. The majority of them have experienced some form of political and economic uncertainties and their judiciary is regarded as the weakest branch of government.

Najib’s arguments for a different trial process relied on comparing countries with preventive detention framework that do not meet the requirements of due process and rule of law. Najib’s argument is flawed because he has given us the wrong examples.

National Security and Human Rights

Najib’s argument is based on national security and fundamental freedoms such as human rights as being in an inverse relationship to each other. Najb and BN believe that in order to have greater national security there will have to be lesser fundamental freedoms and human rights. This is not correct. They are in fact complementary and each is dependent on the other.

Kofi Annan, the former Secretary General of the United Nations in dealing with terrorism reminded member countries:-

“Our responses to terrorism, as well as our efforts to thwart it and prevent it, should uphold the human rights that terrorists aim to destroy. Respect for human rights, fundamental freedoms and the rule of law are essential tools in the effort to combat terrorism -  not to be sacrificed at a time of  tension”- United Nations March 6, 2003

Najib failed to heed Kofi Annan’s advice. Najib failed to realize that in order to counter terrorism, it is not enough to imprison or execute the terrorist the terrorist must be given a fair and open trial so that the public knows that the terrorist is nothing more than a common criminal.  A show trial will only serve to turn a monster into a martyr. Failure by the public to view the terrorist’s act as a crime will cause the terrorist to be canonized into a folk hero, inspiring others to join the terrorists groups.

The best security against violent attacks is an effective criminal justice system to detect, prosecute and punish perpetrators of violence alongside measures to tackle long term causes that facilitate and breed violence. The greatest duty of any state is to ensure the safety and security of its citizens and the surest way for this to be done is to make a clear and public statement of the state’s commitment to the rule of law, human rights and that the actions taken must be legal, necessary and proportionate. SOSMA has failed to do this.

National Security and History

Najib has failed to learn from the lessons of failed national security regimes.

George W. Bush declared “war on terror” after the 9/11 attacks. He took the position that in order to effectively counter terrorism, it was required that human rights, well tried systems of due process, humane treatment of detainees, personal rights of privacy, open government must all be set aside. George W. Bush allowed detainees to be tortured. He enacted the Patriot Act and signed executive orders restricting civil liberties, authorized suspects to be held in Guantanamo Bay to be interrogated, tortured and established secret military tribunals to convict the suspects with reduced standards of proof. These were seen by Americans to be an illegitimate use of his powers.

By enacting these illegitimate laws and executive orders, George W Bush found himself struggling for his political survival and they reduced the United States of America’s standing in the international arena. These laws cost the Republican Party the Presidential Elections. Tony Blair joined Bush and enacted the Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2011 to detain suspected terrorist without trial. Tony Blair cost the Labour Party the British General Elections.

Barrack Obama campaigned for the US Presidency on the platform that included closing Guantanamo Bay. After he was elected, he did so on January 22, 2009. He also signed a further executive order to review the options of preventive detention in accordance with the laws.

Najib also did not take heed of the lessons learned from the Troubles in Northern Ireland. The Committee on the Administration of Justice, an affiliate of the International Federation of Human Rights sent a panel of eminent jurist to study and report on the Northern Ireland conflict after the “War on Terror” was declared. Britain had during the Troubles in Northern Ireland interned suspected IRA members. The internees were subject to ill-treatment and torture. The allegations of wrongful internment, ill-treatment and torture fueled anger against the authorities. In the end these measures meant in the eyes of the public that the criminal justice system lost credibility in upholding the rights of the thousands of individuals that were arrested and detained.

The Panel of Jurists reported that emergency laws[7]:-

Corrodes the normal criminal justice system;
Politicizes the rule of law;
Creates a climate of fear;
Provides privileges to information gathering for political purposes and not evidential reasons;
Corrupts individuals and institutions;

Is ineffective in deterring terrorism because it demonizes and alienate the very communities that could be of most assistance;
Fuels the very violence it is attempting to undermine by exacerbating real or perceived grievances and by giving propaganda victories to state opponents
Miscarriages of justice arising from the regime also served to undermine the efforts to fight the terrorists. The Guildford Four and the Maguire Seven were examples. They were convicted for the Guildford pub bombings by the IRA. The convictions were reversed many years later by the courts that found the original decisions to convict “unsafe and unsatisfactory”. They had by then served their sentences. The case of the Birmingham Six is also the same. They were convicted for the Birmingham pub bombing by the IRA. The Court of Appeal reversed their convictions for the same reasons that they found the convictions “unsafe and unsatisfactory”.


In the “war on terror” among the most tragic miscarriages of justice is the case of Brazilian, Jean Charles de Menezes who was shot by the police seven times in the head after he was misidentified as a terrorist. The London Metropolitan Police later issued an apology but that could not bring back the man from the dead.


Najib must be reminded that those who do not learn from history is condemned to repeat the mistakes. The United States and the United Kingdom have learned from their mistakes. Americans and the British rejected the preventive detention of George W Bush and Tony Blair at the polls. Guantanamo is now closed but Kamunting will remain open under a new name. It is up to Malaysians to decide whether they want Kamunting open or closed at the ballot box.

The Courage of Conviction for Change

Najib has not show the courage of conviction and commitment to push through the desperately needed reforms. Malaysia needs a leader with the wisdom to know that the only way to defend our society must be to defend the rule of law and not to jettison it.

Dato Seri Anwar Ibrahim has shown the courage of conviction and commitment needed. They have accused him of everything they can think of; from falsely accusing him twice of sodomy, publishing false sex videos, calling him a traitor to his race and religion, beaten and imprisoned him. They have now resorted to throwing everything they can find including bricks and pots except the kitchen sink to stop his ceramahs. Yet through it all he remains steadfast and unflinching in his commitment for change and to restore the rule of law. If Malaysians do not want illusory transformation then this forthcoming general election, they should join the chorus in Michael Jackson’s song to tell the moon walker:-

“They told him don’t ever come around here

Don’t wanna see your face, you better disappear

The fire’s in their eyes and their words are really clear

So beat it, just beat it”


 
Photobucket

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Recent Comments

Blogger Gadgets